Looking for:
Ea sports fifa 2000 free download full version for pc |
Ea sports fifa 2000 free download full version for pc.WELCOME TO THE WORLD’S GAME
Ea sports fifa 2000 free download full version for pc
Full Specifications. What's new in version. Release December 5, Date Added October 23, Operating Systems. Operating Systems Windows, Windows 95, Windows Total Downloads , Downloads Last Week 5. Report Software. Related Software. Experience the game of soccer with astounding players and living stadiums. FIFA 07 Free to try. Play as one of six top football clubs in a match at Arsenal's Emirates Stadium. World Cricket Championship 2 for Windows 10 Free. Enjoy playing cricket with your own team of players.
Pro Evolution Soccer demo Free to try. This is enjoyable for a time, but lacks real challenge since many of the clubs are simply not in the same class as traditional heavyweights like Spain, Germany, England, and Italy. Unless you gear things down to the pathetically easy to master Amateur skill setting, there's no point in bothering with the likes of Israel, Denmark, and, uh, Andorra.
You might be able to squeeze into the final sixteen, but you won't win a game once you're there without the thumbs of a genetically modified fifteen-year-old. Another problem is that you can't step into the tournament without going through the qualification rounds; meaning that it's impossible to start the tournament itself with the same match-ups that will take place in the real Euro Not being able to re-enact matches and follow the event as it takes place will likely prove a real disappointment to buyers of the game.
It's a huge oversight. While still almost maddeningly fast, gameplay seems toned down a notch from that in FIFA Regardless, this isn't a sim. You need incredible hand-eye coordination and cramp-proof thumbs to truly compete here. Winning at the Professional and World Class difficulty settings requires mastery of all the gamepad buttons and functions.
Deking opponents and flipping the ball up over sliding tackles are necessities to avoid the miserly defenders and gain good shooting position.
No other title asks the player to master all the intricacies of player control just to compete. Which still astounds me. Am I the only one who can't understand why a soccer game is faster paced and more demanding of killer reflexes than hockey and basketball titles from the same company? I realize that EA wants to jazz things up somewhat, but this is ridiculous.
There are also a few holdover quirks in how matches play out. While the artificial intelligence is pretty good overall, the computer cheats in rather blatant fashion.
When stripped of the ball by a computer-controlled opponent anywhere close to its goal, the human side player always loses his balance for a crucial second or two. Of course, that brief moment allows the opposition to move the ball upfield and out of danger. This doesn't work in reverse. Taking the ball away from the CPU does nothing, and the ex-ballhandler often instantly regains possession. Computer players can also run down anyone.
Even the likes of Michael Owen is easily run down and stripped of the ball, no matter what sort of lead he has. It's still far too difficult to defend corner kicks.
The lowliest opponent on the continent end up with possession and a great scoring chance on a routine basis. And taking them is often harder than it should be, particularly when facing a top keeper. No matter where I directed the ball in a recent game with Spain, for example, the ball always ended up safely in the goaltender's hands.
Oh, and the computer also gains the benefit of a doubt on hard tackles. Expect to be bodychecked into the turf a good dozen times per game without reproach from the officials. These assaults typically take place in vital areas. The opening goal in a game between Croatia and Romania last night was caused by the Croat forward slamming a defender to the ground and stealing the ball. I was stunned to see it, and so was my keeper, who had no chance on the subsequent shot.
Although a stable product, Euro shipped with one serious bug that prevents the Team Management button from being clicked on with a mouse during a match. Fortunately, the menus can be navigated with a gamepad, which doesn't have this problem.
All of the other buttons in the game worked fine for me. Presentation values are identical to FIFA The only real difference is the lack of a funky musical score to accompany the menus. Even more soccer flavor is added, as you can run players around before the kick is taken in order to confuse the defense. While the kicker now has the ability to bend the ball around walls nice touch , I almost prefer the control I had in FIFA 99 where I could control how hard I took the kick, and whether it was aerial or along the turf.
More explanation of this by the manual would be appreciated, but of course this isn't the kind of thing you're going to see elaborated upon in a page flyer. So what's the gameplay like? The Amateur level is woefully incapable of putting up a challenge for experienced players, and after a week even newbies will tire of playing Andorra and beating Italy Professional level is better, and is what I normally play on. However, you will eventually master this and want a greater challenge, which is when you'll switch to the hardest level and have the experience that Barak describes.
Your players will be unable to hold the ball for more than a fraction of a second, and you will be passing the ball around madly, unable to use many of the skill moves because those actually involve dribbling.
I'm sure that with sufficient practice you can put on quite a show at World Class level, but the point is that no matter how good you get, the game will simply make you look like that guy in the Who song [Elton John?
Now that's frightening In the end, while the gameplay at the highest level is very challenging, and while the Professional level does allow for some passing and space, the fact is that it simply isn't soccer. You'll never chip the keeper from thirty yards, all your goals will be scored inside the box, and your defenders will never step up to deliver a telling header off a corner.
You won't have your centre-forward take the ball with his back to the goal, move away from the box, and turn to deliver a perfect pass releasing his overlapping right midfielder.
This is where the new animations are so nice. Despite all the too-perfect passes and back-and-forth running, the body movements now remind you that this is still the "beautiful game. I've held off on this for as long as possible, but it's time to address the game's treatment of MLS, which seems to have been deemed important enough to have warranted a license and its name on the front of the box. This treatment is, in a word, shameful.
Ok, two words: shameful and embarrassing. First of all, there are 15 leagues represented in the game. Fourteen of them can be played in season mode. One cannot. Can you guess which one? Of course. This comment is not intended as a slight to those leagues, but simply an illustration of the fact that while American gamers can play full seasons using leagues which they most likely know very little about and probably aren't that interested in, they can't use season mode to play their home nation's league.
Although Turkish fans have something to gripe about as well: EA have incredibly omitted Galatasaray. Actually, when I say that you can't play MLS in season mode, I should amend that to say that you can if you use the "custom league" option and manually select all the MLS clubs to participate. The problem with this is that MLS has a distinctively American flavor where everything comes down to the playoffs, rather than ending in a regular-season winner.
This, in turn, depends on the very American system of conferences, where teams are separated geographically, with most play being between members of the same conference. Sadly, if you use the custom league option, you have no choice but to amalgamate all the teams into a single, European-style division. How generic. Don't even think about having the clock count down, the lack of injury time, or the infamous "shootout.
Rumor actually has it that MLS will eliminate the shootout next year thank God , but the whole thing really makes a mockery of EA 's famous slogan: "If it's in the game, it's in the game. The second problem is with the club rosters. Many of them are just plain wrong. For example, when I went to set the lineup for my own Chicago Fire, I was puzzled by the defensive alignment: C. Brown, Francis Okaroh, and He wasn't there.
Not even as a sub. Simply missing. Sure, Zenga was released by the club in September as the team's playoff hopes faded, but this doesn't explain why so many other players who had left their clubs long before Zenga did are still there.
In fact, if you want to play your favorite MLS club, the odds are you'll have to do some heavy editing before you're able to field any kind of realistic side. The game does have an editor which gives you the ability to edit player names, positions, and appearances, so those with more patience than I can eventually set things right.
I'll be looking for custom files on download sites, thank you. Another inexplicable decision has to do with match commentary. Now, I readily admit that when it comes to soccer announcers, there are really no good American ones, just like there doesn't seem to be any good MLS referees.
However, the choice of Phil Schoen is almost an insult to those of us who have ears. While not quite as bad as Ty Keough, Schoen is typical of the American style of commentary where players' personalities or lives are discussed more than the game itself.
I think this has to do with the nature of football and baseball, where five seconds of action are followed by five minutes of doing nothing and announcers have to fill the space with stuff no one cares about anyway.
During a soccer match, of course, this isn't necessary. Nevertheless, I have heard American announcers feel the need to finish their sentences about a player's exploits as a windsurfer or something while he was scoring a goal. This doesn't happen in FIFA , but associations are not easily broken, and I have a feeling many American soccer viewers will cringe at the sound of a voice they would prefer not to have to hear while playing a computer game.
Foudy is better, but the whole thing sounds rather incongruous. I wonder if the inclusion of Foudy was some sort of attempt to carry the overmarketing of the Women's World Cup as far as possible, since her commentary is advertised on the box with a picture and only a single mention of Phil Schoen, even though Schoen does the majority of the speaking.
Furthermore, a lot of the phrases seem to be identical to the ones in FIFA 99 , except that now they're spoken by Schoen and Foudy instead of Lawrenson, Gray, and Waddle. This is almost acceptable for MLS matches.
After all, I hear it on television, so I'm used to it. But to have a Newcastle-Sunderland derby narrated by these two?
Simply surreal. It would be like having Des Lynam announce the Super Bowl. Not much creativity on the part of EA there, and more evidence that the MLS part of the game was hastily thrown together. Lastly, there are the stadiums. There isn't even a pretense of modeling these, and games are played instead in stadiums which have no relation to the fields they are representing.
What's funny about this is that since all the clubs play in American football stadiums except for the Columbus Crew, EA has modeled all these venues in the Madden series. In fact, EA could have taken a jab at MLS by "realistically" depicting the actual pitches and covering the grass with white football markings during September and October since the fields are shared, often on consecutive days , with the soccer lines drawn in yellow.
And stadiums could have been depicted with tens of thousands of empty seats, rather than the 60, per match shown in the game. But I'm glad that EA didn't make the game that realistic. That's a lot of ranting. What it all boils down to is that in the United States, it seems that EA paid for a license simply to use the name, and then haphazardly put something in the box which only vaguely resembles the real thing. Contrast this with the care that was taken with the Premiership sides.
I can just imagine what would have happened had the Arsenal squad still had Nicolas Anelka, or if Davor Suker weren't there, or if Highbury looked like Old Trafford or something. It may be difficult for some to understand because we're talking about MLS , but when you plaster a name on a box and lead fans to believe they're getting something, it's hard to blame them when they are upset because they opened the box and the promised goods weren't there.
Think it would be acceptable to buy the game as a Saints fan, only to discover that instead of the Dell you'll be playing all your home matches at something that looks like Amsterdam ArenA, and that Matt Le Tissier isn't even in the game? Of course not. Would there be a scandal or what?
This review really covers two separate issues. One is the FIFA product as a whole. On that score, EA has come up with a winner.
No comments:
Post a Comment